
This web site is dedicated to investment fund investor education and protection. The multi-billion fund industry plays a key role in the savings and retirement plans of millions of Canadians. Many industry practices provide beartraps for the unsuspecting investor and securities regulations have not kept up with the pace of change in the industry.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Advisors as Executors: A wise move?
This article outlines the risks involved in appointing your investment advisor as your executor. Right now regulators do not perrmit this but the IIROC Board is considering allowing it subject to some conditions. Read the article
Fiduciary Standard and Financial Advice: Findings from Academic Literature
Fiduciary
Standard and Financial Advice: Findings from Academic Literature
Abstract: This
article provides an overview of theory and empirical evidence related
to the benefits and costs resulting from the application of a
fiduciary standard of care to the conduct of brokers, dealers
(broker-dealers), and investment advisors. The purpose of this
document is not to advocate a position on possible regulatory
actions. It is intended to provide an in-depth review of the extant
literature, primarily from economics, finance, and law, related to
the regulation, incentives, and outcomes of the existing advice
marketplace. Opinions on the likely impact of various strategies on
the marketplace are entirely those of the author and are based on the
preponderance of empirical evidence and the strength of related
theories. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2419727
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
Kenmar Commentary on the CSA commissioned Fund Fee Research Report
Dealer / advisor conflicts-of-interest are top of mind for regulators and investor advocates.Conflicted advice can skew recommendations that are not in the best interests of investors , thereby impairing savings and retirement accounts. The CSA commissioned third party research into the impact of advisor compensation on advisor recommendations.The Researcher was to conduct a literature review to evaluate the extent, if any, to which the use of fee-based vs. commission based
compensation changes the nature of advice and investment outcomes over the long term.
Following a competitive procurement by the CSA, the Brondesbury Group was contracted to conduct this research. The Brondesbury Group has now completed their work and their findings are set out in the Mutual Fund Fees Research report which is the basis for our commentary. The report concluded that there is sufficient evidence of skewing to consider regulatory reforms.Indirectly, the report also points to the need for the standard of advice giving to be examined since a change in compensation model alone cannot satisfactorily resolve the core issue.Read our Commentary on the Report which is made from the perspective of the retail investor.
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
INVESTOR ALERT: Think twice before using internal Bank "Ombudsman"
If you have a complaint with a a Bank-owned IIROC investment dealer you may find yourself getting an offer to make use of the Bank's internal "Ombudsman" if you didn't accept the dealer's restitution offer ( if any). This INVESTOR ALERT tells you that the use of this " Ombudsman" is entirely voluntary and warns of the risks involved . You may want to use the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments, a free, independent Dispute Resolution Service.
Saturday, June 6, 2015
Can Socially Responsible Investing reduce portfolio risk?
Responsible Investing (RI) aka Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) incorporates environmental, social and corporate governance criteria into the selection of investments.For some, these constraints mean that portfolio construction is limited, opportunities lost and risk increased.But a May , 2015 study suggests that RI provides a number of potential advantages including strong financial returns,reduced risk , and more downside protection than traditional mutual fund incvestments.RI mutual funds and venture capital funds now total $17.5 billion . The paper Canadian Responsible Investment mutual funds : Risk?Return Characteristics Study Findings can be read here It should be noted that not everyone agrees with the screening criteria. For example, those who survived the horrors of WWII do not necesarrily agree that investments in weapons manufaxturers like Lockheed Martin are necessarily undesirable. To them , it means the ability to defend our democracy and freedom .
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Ethics and trust in financial Services: John Bogle
JOHN
BOGLE SPEECH
AT GEORGETOWN LAW
- Nov
05, 2014
John delivered a keynote speech before the Public-Private Partnership Symposium at Georgetown University School of Law on October 31, 2014. Titled “Values, Ethics, and Structure in Finance,” the speech discusses the importance of getting the right structure of business model and incentives in order to have a financial system that serves the needs of clients first. “Values, Ethics, and Structure in Finance,” October 31, 2014, Georgetown University School of Law .
John delivered a keynote speech before the Public-Private Partnership Symposium at Georgetown University School of Law on October 31, 2014. Titled “Values, Ethics, and Structure in Finance,” the speech discusses the importance of getting the right structure of business model and incentives in order to have a financial system that serves the needs of clients first. “Values, Ethics, and Structure in Finance,” October 31, 2014, Georgetown University School of Law .
Friday, May 29, 2015
Research on Advisor Fiduciary duty
- Ditching the Securities Blanket - Revisiting the Financial Advisor-Client Fiduciary Obligation in Canadian Law by Mark Donald The author's conclusion : " While obviously well-intentioned, many supporters of a blanket statutory fiduciary/best interest standard apparently view this equitable legal construct as a sort of panacea. This position ignores the significant practical legal perils that such a statutory creation would create, and puts investor advocates on an unhelpful, and arguably unavoidable collision course with IAs and the securities defence bar.The better way forward would be for all parties to consider the power of targeted, systemic regulatory changes to the financial services industry, and accept that wholesale revolution to the client-advisor relationship is not a precondition to developing a fairer and more efficient financial services industry. Such an approach could have profound, positive results, while avoiding the theoretical debates that make a fiduciary/best interest solution so elusive.". Read it here
Thursday, May 14, 2015
Fed up with bank fees and bank exploitation?
If the latest round of bank fee increases finally got you upset enough to take action , read this article.
Some apathetic folks are simply taking the approach " If you can't beat em, buy em" and are investing in bank stocks. Over the years the fees they collect from the docile can mean real gains and dividends for shareholders. In any event, there's a feel good emotion thaat some of the client gouging is coming back to you.
Some apathetic folks are simply taking the approach " If you can't beat em, buy em" and are investing in bank stocks. Over the years the fees they collect from the docile can mean real gains and dividends for shareholders. In any event, there's a feel good emotion thaat some of the client gouging is coming back to you.
Case study : The reality of Investor Protection in Canada
This case will open your eyes . The sad reality is when you invest you have to be constantly on guard. There are many forces working against you and too few forces working to protect you from Bay Street shenanigans. Be aware that your “ advisor” is not required to act in your
Best interests .
He/she may also be motivated by sales commissions to
actually place you and your retirement in harm’s way. CAVEAT EMPTOR prevails in Canada’s “ Wealth Management
industry “, an industry creating wealth but not necessarily for you.
Sunday, May 3, 2015
Equity Crowdfunding poses significant risks for main Street
Equity Crowdfunding is coming whether we like it or not - you need to be ready.Companies raising capital on regulated, public stock markets must jump through all sorts of disclosure hoops intended to protect the public from fraud. When they raise capital in private markets, often for early-stage companies, they may generally tap only "accredited" investors--those who can prove they are wealthy and sophisticated enough to participate in what are inherently risky ventures.
What if you could remove both constraints, allowing issuers to offer securities to the general public without the rigorous disclosures required when "going public"? That's Equity Crowdfunding .
Read more here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)